Skip to main content
Download PDF

Dopaminergic reward system: a short integrative review

International Archives of Medicine volume 3, Article number: 24 (2010) Cite this article

Abstract

Memory is an essential element to adaptive behavior since it allows consolidation of past experience guiding the subject to consider them in future experiences. Among the endogenous molecules that participate in the consolidation of memory, including the drug-seeking reward, considered as a form of learning, is dopamine. This neurotransmitter modulates the activity of specific brain nucleus such as nuclei accumbens, putamen, ventral tegmental area (VTA), among others and synchronizes the activity of these nuclei to establish the neurobiological mechanism to set the hedonic element of learning. We review the experimental evidence that highlights the activity of different brain nuclei modulating the mechanisms whereby dopamine biases memory towards events that are of motivational significance.

Introduction

Since dopamine (DA) was described as a neurotransmitter in the central nervous system half a century ago [1], its involvement in movement control has long been emphasized due to the association between the amount of striatal DA depletion and motor deficits observed in Parkinson's disease (PD) [2]. Diverse experiments have led to a number of therapeutic interventions to alleviate patients' symptoms, such as L-DOPA therapy [3]. It is known that DA is involved in the neurobiology and symptoms of a myriad of neurological and psychiatric diseases, including schizophrenia and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and it is being considered an essential element in the brain reward system and in the action of many drugs with abuse potential [4, 5].

Although dopaminergic neurons account for less than 1% of the total neuronal population of the brain[6], they have a profound effect on brain function. For instance, there are modifications of synaptic plasticity as a consequence of learning and memory due to the activity of the metabotropic DA receptors [6, 7]. Learning is a change in responsiveness to a particular stimulus whereas memory is the cellular modification that mediates that change. In this regard, recent evidence indicates that DA is involved in reward-related incentive learning [8, 9]. However, the mechanism involving DA modulating behavioral choice towards available rewards remains unknown. In this review, we examine the current view of the role of DA in learning and behavioral, with particular regard to reward-seeking behavior.

Rewarding System and Brain

Rewards are defined as those objects, which we will work to acquire through allocation of time, energy, or effort; that is, any object or goal that we seek [10]. Rewards are crucial for individual and support elementary processes such as drinking, eating and reproduction. The behavioral definition of reward attributes also certain of non-alimentary and nonsexual functions, such as gambling. Rewards engage agents in such diverse behaviors as foraging and trading on stock markets [10].

Due to this requirement, it has been proposed that there exists a single neural system which processes rewards in its different modalities and thereby functions as a common scale through which diverse rewards may be contrasted [11].

Several lines of evidence support the conclusion that the brain's mesencephalic DA system responds to rewards. But, what is the role of DA plays in reward processing? No solid evidence is available about this issue [6, 12, 13]. However, it has been demonstrated that DA is involved in the hedonic component of reward [6, 14]. Several lines of evidence show that the receipt of rewards evokes an increase in DA activity; however numerous conditions exist for which this does not hold. Several hypotheses have been proposed to draw a different mechanism [14, 15]. For example, it has been suggested that activity changes in DA neurons encode an error in the prediction of the time and amount of immediate and future rewards (the prediction error hypothesis), therefore, the DA activity is hypothesized to indicate that the immediate or future prospect for reward is better than expected.

The Mesocorticolimbic Dopamine System

In the adult brain, dopaminergic neurons are a heterogeneous group of cells localized in the mesencephalon, diencephalon and the olfactory bulb [6, 16]. However, nearly all DA cells reside in the ventral part of the mesencephalon (Figure 1). Mesodiencephalic dopaminergic neurons form substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc), the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and the retrorubral field (RRF). Additionally, the nigrostriatal system, which originates in the SNc and extends its fibers into the caudate-putamen nucleus, plays an essential role in the control of voluntary movement [17, 18]. The DA system includes the mesolimbic and mesocortical pathway, which arise from VTA and they have been suggested to modulate emotion-related behavior [14, 19, 20]. The mesolimbic dopaminergic system include VTA that project mainly to the nucleus accumbens (NAc) as well as the olfactory tubercle innervating the septum, amygdala and hippocampus. On the other hand, the mesocortical dopaminergic system which includes the VTA, extends its fibers in the prefrontal, cingulate and perirhinal cortex. Because of the overlap between these two systems they are often collectively referred to as the mesocorticolimbic system [21, 22].

Figure 1
figure1_91

Overview of reward structures in the human brain. Dopaminergic neurons are located in the midbrain structures substantia nigra (SNc) and the ventral tegmental area (VTA). Their axons project to the striatum (caudate nucleus, putamen and ventral striatum including nucleus accumbens), the dorsal and ventral prefrontal cortex. Additional brain structures influenced by reward include the supplementary motor area in the frontal lobe, the rhinal cortex in the temporal lobe, the pallidum and subthalamic nucleus in the basal ganglia, and a few others.

Full size image

In human brain, there are relatively few neurons in the SNc and VTA (less than 400,000 in the SNc and roughly 5,000 in the VTA [16, 23]). Despite that the number of neurons is small, the projections from individual neurons are extensive and hence modulate diverse brain functions. The midbrain dopaminergic neuron is thought to have total axonal length (including collaterals) totaling roughly 74 cm [16] whereas synaptic connections are equally as extensive, with 500,000 terminals common for an individual neuron [16]. In the striatum, approximately 20% of all synapses in the structure [24, 25].

From their different nuclei, dopaminergic axons progress medially where they join together and project through the median forebrain bundle (MFB) to the internal capsule [16], then the internal capsule, the axons branch off to form synapses in their target locations [16]. SNc neurons send projections to the caudate and putamen nuclei (striatum), named the nigrostriatal system. Dopaminergic axons originating in the VTA innervates to the ventral part of the striatum, a region named NAc [16].

The diverse physiological actions of DA are mediated by five distinct G protein-coupled receptor subtypes [26, 27]. Two D1-like receptor subtypes (D1A-1D and D5) couple to the Gs protein that activate adenylyl cyclase [26, 27]. The other receptor subtypes belong to the D2-like subfamily (D2, D3, and D4) and are Gi protein-coupled receptors that inhibit adenylyl cyclase and activate K+ channels [26, 27].

The DA receptors have a similar pattern of distribution that dopaminergic fibers [6, 28]. For instance, the relative concentration of D1-like receptors compared to D2 receptor is higher in the prefrontal cortex, whereas the concentration of D2-like receptors is elevated in the caudate nucleus, putamen, and nucleus accumbens [26, 29]. Importantly, although D1 and D2 receptors have opposite effect at the molecular level, they often act synergistically when more complex outputs are taken into account [30, 31].

The neuromolecular mechanism of action of DA is the following: DA is released outside the synaptic cleft [32, 33], then it diffuses in the extracellular fluid from which it is slowly cleared as a result of reuptake and metabolism and activates its receptors [34]. One important issue is that DA firing pattern occurs in response to motivationally relevant stimuli [35], it is unlikely that these phasic DA signals influence, to any significant extent, the behavioral response (mediated by fast transmitting pathways) to the same stimulus that triggered them [36, 37]. Thus, this neurotransmitter acts as a delayed responding amplifier and modulates behavioral impact [36, 37].

Dopamine Lesions and Disorganized Behaviours

Selective lesioning of DA innervation often reproduces the effects of the lesion itself and disorganizes behavior [38]. The integrative properties of the DA system are probably associated more with direct contributions to cognitive functions at the cortical level, namely in working memory, executive functions and possibly time estimation processes. Since DA brain activity apparently decreases with normal aging, stimulating DA transmission in the elderly could represent a reliable strategy for improving behavioral deficits, as shown in pathological situations such as Parkinson's Disease (PD), where the impairment of DA transmission is evident [39].

Dopamine and Neurodegenerative Diseases

DA has been associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as PD. It has been demonstrated that a progressive loss of neuromelanin-containing DA neurons in the SNc of the ventral midbrain inducing DA depletion in the striatum, and it has been suggested that this deficit induces motor symptoms associated with PD, including bradykinesia, tremor, rigidity and loss of postural control [40]. In this context, it is interesting to note that the main signs of the pre-frontal syndrome in humans, for example, the diminution in interest in the environment, sensory neglect, distractibility, visuomotor impairment, among others are under DA regulation [41]. Furthermore, negative symptoms of schizophrenia or Alzheimer's disease, also related with DA system [42]. In this regard, a decrease in D1 receptor density in the frontal cortex of schizophrenic patients with negative signs have been shown no change in the striatum [43–45].

Dopamine and Learning

Instrumental conditioning allows subjects to influence their environment and determine their rate of reward. A general theory is proposed that attributes the origins of human intelligence to an expansion of dopaminergic systems in human cognition [46].

The role of DA on learning and memory has been studied for many years. In this regard, it is known that the D2 receptor agonist bromocriptine modulates working memory performance [47]. Behavioral studies show that DA projections to the striatum and frontal cortex play a central role in mediating the effects of rewards on approach behavior and learning [36]. These results are derived from selective lesions of different components of DA systems, systemic and intracerebral administration of direct and indirect DA receptor agonist and antagonist drugs, electrical self-stimulation, and self-administration of major drugs of abuse, such as cocaine, amphetamine, opiates, alcohol, and nicotine [36, 37]. Therefore, more information is required from animal models, where functional studies are possible.

Dopamine and Reward

Most goal-directed motivation -even the seeking of food or water - is learned [48]. It is largely through selective reinforcement of initially random movements, that the behavior of the neonate comes to be both directed at and motivated by appropriate stimuli in the environment [49]. For the most part, one's motivation is to return to the rewards experienced in the past, and to the cues that mark the way to such rewards. It is primarily through its role in the selective reinforcement of associations between rewards and otherwise neutral stimuli that DA is important for such motivation. Once stimulus-reward associations have been formed, they can remain potent for some time even after the reward has been devalued by the absence of appropriate drive states such as hunger or thirst [48], or because the DA system is blocked [50]. Once a habit has been established, it remains largely autonomous until the conditioned significance of incentive motivational stimuli has been extinguished or devalued through experience. Extinction of the conditioned significance of such stimuli can result from repeated unrewarded trials, repeated trials in the absence of an appropriate drive state, or repeated trials under the influence of neuroleptics [51]. DA appears to be important for learning and memory processes [36].

The Rewarding System and Addictive Drugs

Over the past 40 years, experimental psychologists have been developing and refining behavioral models of addiction using inventive animal protocols.

Addiction is a neurobiological illness where repetitive substance abuse corrupts the normal circuitry of rewarding and adaptive behaviors causing drug-induced neuroplastic changes. Most findings support that addictive drugs share the common property of enhancing the effect of midbrain DA function, particularly at the level of their terminals in the nucleus accumbens [52, 53].

Among the drugs that activate the DA system is cocaine. This compound is a monoamine uptake blocker which binds with greatest affinity to DA transporters which in turn, participate in the mechanism for removal DA from synapses. Blockade of the transporters, therefore, greatly enhances DA's efficacy. It has been indicated that this effect could be the cause of cocaine addiction [54]. Amphetamines activate similar pathway [55, 56].

On the other hand, alcohol is believed to affect brain function primarily by enhancing the function of GABA receptors, the primary inhibitory receptors in the brain [57] and reduce the firing rate of neurons in the SNc [58]. Opiates cause a similar release of DA in the striatum [59], both through disinhibition in the VTA and through direct effects on DA terminals [59, 60]. Furthermore, blocking opioid receptors in either the VTA or NAc reduces heroin self-administration [61].

Finally, self-administration of nicotine is also blocked by infusion of DA receptor antagonists or by lesion of DA neurons in NAc [62]. The proposal that the dopaminergic system is part of a final pathway for the reinforcing effects of drugs abuse is very appealing and fits in nicely with the literature on brain self-stimulation [63]. Furthermore, chronic exposure to drugs of abuse causes longterm adaptations in cAMP concentrations, tyrosine hydroxylase production, DA expression, receptor coupling to G proteins, and basal firing rate of VTA-DA neurons [64, 65]. These mechanisms have been thought to underlie addiction and contribute to relapse to drug taking following periods of abstinence [66–68].

Experimental models to study drug addiction have been developed. For instance, DA transporter KO mice are still capable of developing cocaine addiction [69, 70]. This discovery suggested that cocaine's effects would also involving the serotonergic and noradrenanergic transporters [71]. This idea is further supported by the fact that enhanced serotonergic function reduces alcohol self administration [72, 73].

Dopamine and Gambling

A recent study on the other hand, showed faster learning as well as an increase in winning at gambling in response to DA consumption [9]. A simple betting game study by Pessiglione and colleges showed that participants spotted winning strategies at a faster rate if they were given DA in the form of L-DOPA (repetitive). When subjects win a bet, they seem to experience a DA "high" in the form of a reward, which in turn helps them to remember to make the same choice the next time. When the reward for winning was increased through a monetary reward, DA recipients only noticed winning symbols but not the "losing" symbols. These results might explain why L-DOPA treated PD patients become sometimes addicted to gambling [39, 74]. DA surges might also explain some of the delusions experienced by people with schizophrenia [41]. Different works have shown that DA is involved in addiction. When people take drugs such as cocaine or amphetamines, they experience artificially induced DA surges which give them the rewarding "high" they crave [22]. The same DA "highs" also occur in people with other addictive behaviors such as gambling, sex and exercise [75]. DA is the brain's mean for reinforcing behavior. Possibly, this work is a system for minimizing prediction errors. Unexpected rewards result in a particularly high amount of DA release and greater learning.

However, recent research finds that while some dopaminergic neurons react in the way expected of reward neurons, others do not and seem to respond in regard to unpredictability [76]. The activity of dopaminergic neurons are thought to be increased by stimuli that predict reward and decreased by stimuli that predict aversive outcomes. Recent work by Matsumoto and Hikosaka challenges this model by asserting that stimuli associated with either rewarding or aversive outcomes increase the activity of dopaminergic neurons in the SNc [76]. This research finds the reward neurons predominate in the ventromedial region in the SNc as well as the VTA. Neurons in these areas project mainly to the ventral striatum and thus might transmit value-related information in regard to reward values. The nonreward neurons are predominate in the dorsolateral area of the SNc which projects to the dorsal striatum and may relate to orienting behavior has been suggested that the difference between these two types of dopaminergic neurons arises from their input: reward-linked ones have input from the basal forebrain while the nonreward-related ones from the lateral habenula [76].

Conclusions

The past decade has brought an enormous wealth of knowledge on human reward processing using functional brain imaging. Much progress has been made in understanding the neural substrates of human reward processes, but much remains to be learned, and much integration needs to go on among information at the molecular, cellular, systems, and behavioral levels. The pursuit of mechanisms underlying reward has been hampered by the limitations of current animal models and thus requires that basic investigators exchange ideas with those involved in human experimental biology and clinical research. It is clear that neurotransmitters other than DA must play important roles in regulating hedonic states and even in reward-related learning.

Consumption of rewards (e.g., palatable food, mating, cocaine) produces hedonic consequences which initiate learning processes that consolidate liking the rewarding goal. Motivational states such as hunger, sexual arousal, and perhaps early symptoms of drug withdrawal increase the incentive salience of reward-related cues and the reward itself. The greater the hunger, the greater the likelihood that behavioral sequences aimed at obtaining food will be initiated and carried to conclusion despite distractions and obstacles that may arise. Positive reinforcement involves an increase over time in the frequency of behaviors that lead to a reward.

Understanding the neurobiology of the addictive process allows a theoretical psychopharmacological approach for treating addictive disorders, one that takes into account biological interventions aimed at particular stages of the illness.

Conflict of interests

None of the authors have actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence, or be perceived to influence, our work.

References

  1. 1.

    Carlsson A: The occurrence, distribution and physiological role of catecholamines in the nervous system. Pharmacological reviews 1959,11(2, Part 2):490–493.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bernheimer H, Hornykiewicz O: [Decreased homovanillic acid concentration in the brain in parkinsonian subjects as an expression of a disorder of central dopamine metabolism]. Klinische Wochenschrift 1965,43(13):711–715.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bernheimer H, Birkmayer W, Hornykiewicz O, Jellinger K, Seitelberger F: Brain dopamine and the syndromes of Parkinson and Huntington. Clinical, morphological and neurochemical correlations. Journal of the neurological sciences 1973,20(4):415–455.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Di Chiara G, Bassareo V: Reward system and addiction: what dopamine does and doesn't do. Current opinion in pharmacology 2007,7(1):69–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ross S, Peselow E: The neurobiology of addictive disorders. Clinical neuropharmacology 2009,32(5):269–276.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Arias-Carrion O, Poppel E: Dopamine, learning, and reward-seeking behavior. Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis 2007,67(4):481–488.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kandel ER: The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialog between genes and synapses. Bioscience reports 2001,21(5):565–611.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pessiglione M, Schmidt L, Draganski B, Kalisch R, Lau H, Dolan RJ, Frith CD: How the brain translates money into force: a neuroimaging study of subliminal motivation. Science (New York, NY) 2007,316(5826):904–906.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Pessiglione M, Seymour B, Flandin G, Dolan RJ, Frith CD: Dopamine-dependent prediction errors underpin reward-seeking behaviour in humans. Nature 2006,442(7106):1042–1045.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Schultz W: Subjective neuronal coding of reward: temporal value discounting and risk. The European journal of neuroscience 31(12):2124–2135.

  11. 11.

    Shizgal P: Neural basis of utility estimation. Current opinion in neurobiology 1997,7(2):198–208.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Berridge KC, Robinson TE: What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain research 1998,28(3):309–369.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ikemoto S, Panksepp J: The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in motivated behavior: a unifying interpretation with special reference to reward-seeking. Brain research 1999,31(1):6–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Phillips AG, Vacca G, Ahn S: A top-down perspective on dopamine, motivation and memory. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior 2008,90(2):236–249.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wise RA: Dopamine and reward: the anhedonia hypothesis 30 years on. Neurotoxicity research 2008,14(2–3):169–183.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bjorklund A, Dunnett SB: Dopamine neuron systems in the brain: an update. Trends in neurosciences 2007,30(5):194–202.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Smith Y, Villalba R: Striatal and extrastriatal dopamine in the basal ganglia: an overview of its anatomical organization in normal and Parkinsonian brains. Mov Disord 2008,23(Suppl 3):S534–547.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Barbeau A: High-level levodopa therapy in Parkinson's disease: five years later. Transactions of the American Neurological Association 1974, 99:160–163.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yim CY, Mogenson GJ: Electrophysiological studies of neurons in the ventral tegmental area of Tsai. Brain Res 1980,181(2):301–313.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    D'Ardenne K, McClure SM, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD: BOLD responses reflecting dopaminergic signals in the human ventral tegmental area. Science (New York, NY) 2008,319(5867):1264–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wise RA: Forebrain substrates of reward and motivation. The Journal of comparative neurology 2005,493(1):115–121.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wise RA: Dopamine, learning and motivation. Nature reviews 2004,5(6):483–494.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Weidong L, Shen C, Jankovic J: Etiopathogenesis of Parkinson disease: a new beginning? Neuroscientist 2009,15(1):28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zhou FM, Wilson CJ, Dani JA: Cholinergic interneuron characteristics and nicotinic properties in the striatum. Journal of neurobiology 2002,53(4):590–605.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhou FM, Wilson C, Dani JA: Muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic mechanisms in the mesostriatal dopamine systems. Neuroscientist 2003,9(1):23–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Missale C, Nash SR, Robinson SW, Jaber M, Caron MG: Dopamine receptors: from structure to function. Physiological reviews 1998,78(1):189–225.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Vallone D, Picetti R, Borrelli E: Structure and function of dopamine receptors. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews 2000,24(1):125–132.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Saji H, Iida Y, Kawashima H, Ogawa M, Kitamura Y, Mukai T, Shimazu S, Yoneda F: In vivo imaging of brain dopaminergic neurotransmission system in small animals with high-resolution single photon emission computed tomography. Anal Sci 2003,19(1):67–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Jaber M, Robinson SW, Missale C, Caron MG: Dopamine receptors and brain function. Neuropharmacology 1996,35(11):1503–1519.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Verhoeff NP: Radiotracer imaging of dopaminergic transmission in neuropsychiatric disorders. Psychopharmacology 1999,147(3):217–249.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Piccini P: Neurodegenerative movement disorders: the contribution of functional imaging. Current opinion in neurology 2004,17(4):459–466.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Sesack SR, Carr DB, Omelchenko N, Pinto A: Anatomical substrates for glutamate-dopamine interactions: evidence for specificity of connections and extrasynaptic actions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2003, 1003:36–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lapish CC, Kroener S, Durstewitz D, Lavin A, Seamans JK: The ability of the mesocortical dopamine system to operate in distinct temporal modes. Psychopharmacology 2007,191(3):609–625.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Venton BJ, Zhang H, Garris PA, Phillips PE, Sulzer D, Wightman RM: Real-time decoding of dopamine concentration changes in the caudate-putamen during tonic and phasic firing. Journal of neurochemistry 2003,87(5):1284–1295.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Schultz W: Getting formal with dopamine and reward. Neuron 2002,36(2):241–263.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Schultz W: Behavioral dopamine signals. Trends in neurosciences 2007,30(5):203–210.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Schultz W: Multiple dopamine functions at different time courses. Annual review of neuroscience 2007, 30:259–288.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Arias-Carrion O, Freundlieb N, Oertel WH, Hoglinger GU: Adult neurogenesis and Parkinson's disease. CNS & neurological disorders drug targets 2007,6(5):326–335.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Cools R: Dopaminergic modulation of cognitive function-implications for L-DOPA treatment in Parkinson's disease. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews 2006,30(1):1–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Maetzler W, Liepelt I, Berg D: Progression of Parkinson's disease in the clinical phase: potential markers. Lancet neurology 2009,8(12):1158–1171.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Nieoullon A: Dopamine and the regulation of cognition and attention. Progress in neurobiology 2002,67(1):53–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Gibb WR, Mountjoy CQ, Mann DM, Lees AJ: The substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area in Alzheimer's disease and Down's syndrome. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry 1989,52(2):193–200.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Okubo Y, Suhara T, Suzuki K, Kobayashi K, Inoue O, Terasaki O, Someya Y, Sassa T, Sudo Y, Matsushima E, et al.: Decreased prefrontal dopamine D1 receptors in schizophrenia revealed by PET. Nature 1997,385(6617):634–636.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Abi-Dargham A, Moore H: Prefrontal DA transmission at D1 receptors and the pathology of schizophrenia. Neuroscientist 2003,9(5):404–416.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Abi-Dargham A: Probing cortical dopamine function in schizophrenia: what can D1 receptors tell us? World Psychiatry 2003,2(3):166–171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Previc FH: Dopamine and the origins of human intelligence. Brain and cognition 1999,41(3):299–350.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Kimberg DY, D'Esposito M, Farah MJ: Effects of bromocriptine on human subjects depend on working memory capacity. Neuroreport 1997,8(16):3581–3585.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Changizi MA, McGehee RM, Hall WG: Evidence that appetitive responses for dehydration and food-deprivation are learned. Physiology & behavior 2002,75(3):295–304.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Hall H, Sedvall G, Magnusson O, Kopp J, Halldin C, Farde L: Distribution of D1- and D2-dopamine receptors, and dopamine and its metabolites in the human brain. Neuropsychopharmacology 1994,11(4):245–256.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Dickinson A, Smith J, Mirenowicz J: Dissociation of Pavlovian and instrumental incentive learning under dopamine antagonists. Behavioral neuroscience 2000,114(3):468–483.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Pine A, Shiner T, Seymour B, Dolan RJ: Dopamine, time, and impulsivity in humans. J Neurosci 30(26):8888–8896.

  52. 52.

    Di Chiara G, Imperato A: Drugs abused by humans preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1988,85(14):5274–5278.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Olive MF, Koenig HN, Nannini MA, Hodge CW: Stimulation of endorphin neurotransmission in the nucleus accumbens by ethanol, cocaine, and amphetamine. J Neurosci 2001,21(23):RC184.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Lin Z, Uhl GR: Dopamine transporter mutants with cocaine resistance and normal dopamine uptake provide targets for cocaine antagonism. Molecular pharmacology 2002,61(4):885–891.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Zahniser NR, Sorkin A: Trafficking of dopamine transporters in psychostimulant actions. Seminars in cell & developmental biology 2009,20(4):411–417.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kahlig KM, Lute BJ, Wei Y, Loland CJ, Gether U, Javitch JA, Galli A: Regulation of dopamine transporter trafficking by intracellular amphetamine. Molecular pharmacology 2006,70(2):542–548.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Kumar S, Porcu P, Werner DF, Matthews DB, Diaz-Granados JL, Helfand RS, Morrow AL: The role of GABA(A) receptors in the acute and chronic effects of ethanol: a decade of progress. Psychopharmacology 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Mereu G, Gessa GL: Low doses of ethanol inhibit the firing of neurons in the substantia nigra, pars reticulata: a GABAergic effect? Brain Res 1985,360(1–2):325–330.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Haile CN, Kosten TA, Kosten TR: Pharmacogenetic treatments for drug addiction: alcohol and opiates. The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse 2008,34(4):355–381.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Kreek MJ, LaForge KS, Butelman E: Pharmacotherapy of addictions. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2002,1(9):710–726.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Churchill L, Klitenick MA, Kalivas PW: Dopamine depletion reorganizes projections from the nucleus accumbens and ventral pallidum that mediate opioid-induced motor activity. J Neurosci 1998,18(19):8074–8085.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Sorge RE, Clarke PB: Rats self-administer intravenous nicotine delivered in a novel smoking-relevant procedure: effects of dopamine antagonists. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Rothman RB, Gendron T, Hitzig P: Hypothesis that mesolimbic dopamine (DA) plays a key role in mediating the reinforcing effects of drugs of abuse as well as the rewarding effects of ingestive behaviors. Journal of substance abuse treatment 1994,11(3):273–275.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Brami-Cherrier K, Roze E, Girault JA, Betuing S, Caboche J: Role of the ERK/MSK1 signalling pathway in chromatin remodelling and brain responses to drugs of abuse. Journal of neurochemistry 2009,108(6):1323–1335.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Zhang D, Zhang H, Jin GZ, Zhang K, Zhen X: Single dose of morphine produced a prolonged effect on dopamine neuron activities. Molecular pain 2008, 4:57.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Robinson TE, Berridge KC: Review. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London 2008,363(1507):3137–3146.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Berridge KC, Kringelbach ML: Affective neuroscience of pleasure: reward in humans and animals. Psychopharmacology 2008,199(3):457–480.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Berridge KC: The debate over dopamine's role in reward: the case for incentive salience. Psychopharmacology 2007,191(3):391–431.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Rocha BA, Odom LA, Barron BA, Ator R, Wild SA, Forster MJ: Differential responsiveness to cocaine in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice. Psychopharmacology 1998,138(1):82–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    McNamara RK, Levant B, Taylor B, Ahlbrand R, Liu Y, Sullivan JR, Stanford K, Richtand NM: C57BL/6J mice exhibit reduced dopamine D3 receptor-mediated locomotor-inhibitory function relative to DBA/2J mice. Neuroscience 2006,143(1):141–153.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Belej T, Manji D, Sioutis S, Barros HM, Nobrega JN: Changes in serotonin and norepinephrine uptake sites after chronic cocaine: pre- vs. post-withdrawal effects. Brain Res 1996,736(1–2):287–296.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Johnson BA: Role of the serotonergic system in the neurobiology of alcoholism: implications for treatment. CNS drugs 2004,18(15):1105–1118.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Johnson BA: Update on neuropharmacological treatments for alcoholism: scientific basis and clinical findings. Biochemical pharmacology 2008,75(1):34–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    van Schouwenburg M, Aarts E, Cools R: Dopaminergic modulation of cognitive control: distinct roles for the prefrontal cortex and the basal ganglia. Current pharmaceutical design 16(18):2026–2032.

  75. 75.

    Hyman SE, Malenka RC, Nestler EJ: Neural mechanisms of addiction: the role of reward-related learning and memory. Annual review of neuroscience 2006, 29:565–598.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Matsumoto M, Hikosaka O: Two types of dopamine neuron distinctly convey positive and negative motivational signals. Nature 2009,459(7248):837–841.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Individual Postdoctoral Training/Visit, the DAAD Postdoctoral Fellowship and the Förderverein Neurologie Marburg given to OAC. EMR was supported by CONACyT (79009).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Human Science Center (FESTO-Program for Applied Knowing), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany

    Oscar Arias-Carrión & Ernst Pöppel

  2. Department of Neurology, Philipps-Universität, Marburg, Germany

    Oscar Arias-Carrión & Maria Stamelou

  3. Laboratorio de Neurociencias Moleculares e Integrativas. Escuela de Medicina, División Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Anáhuac Mayab, Mérida, Yucatán, México

    Eric Murillo-Rodríguez

  4. Unit of Neurology, Hospital Alvarez-Buylla, Mieres, Spain

    Manuel Menéndez-González

Authors
  1. Oscar Arias-Carrión
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Stamelou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eric Murillo-Rodríguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Manuel Menéndez-González
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ernst Pöppel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oscar Arias-Carrión.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

OAC, MS and EP designed, conducted the literature review and drafted most of the manuscript. EMR and MMG performed the literature review and the drafting of the manuscript. All authors were equally involved in reading and approving the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arias-Carrión, O., Stamelou, M., Murillo-Rodríguez, E. et al. Dopaminergic reward system: a short integrative review. Int Arch Med 3, 24 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-3-24

Download citation